An empirical investigation of the effects of impact fees on housing and land markets

By K. Ihlanfeldt, T. Shaughnessy. 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Land Use Regulations and Property Values: The 'Windfalls Capture' Idea Revisited (2012, unknown): “Some scholars have recommended similar formula substitutes (Ihlanfeldt and Shaughnessy 2004 ; Gdesz 2005 for Poland).”
Impact fees and single-family home construction (2006, background): “As impact fees have gained acceptance, they have been adjusted to more fully reflect marginal costs, but the common perception is that most individual fees remain well below the infrastructure costs of the services that they help fund.(17) Impact fees have therefore reduced, but not eliminated, the ”
Office space supply restrictions in Britain: the political economy of market revenge (2007, unknown): “In such a case, the costs of compliance will appear as a fixed cost and, if the results related to the incidence of Impact Fees are applicable ( Ihlanfeldt and Shaughnessy, 2004 ) will be fully (negatively) capitalised into land prices.”