Sequence Organization In Interaction A Primer In Conversation Analysis

By U. Faber. 2016

1,226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interactional problems in research interviews (2014, background): “Although their application to research interviews is not without controversy (Nikander, 2012), these include conversation analysis (CA; Sacks, 1995; Schegloff, 2007) and membership categorization analysis (MCA; Housley and Fitzgerald, 2002; Jayyusi, 1984; Stokoe, 2012).”
The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification (2017, background): “, Verhagen, 2005, 2015) and in the conversation-analytic tradition (Heritage, 2011, 2012a, 2012b; Sacks, 1987; Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson, 1974; Schegloff, 2007).”
What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence (2018, background): “These turns exhibit design features of “dispreferred” responses (Liddicoat, 2011; Schegloff, 2007): delay through hesitation (line 6, Extract 4; line 5, Extract 5), apology (line 6, Extract 4), and an account explaining the reason for disagreeing (lines 6–8 and 9–10, Extract 4; lines 5–7, Extract 5)”
Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation (2017, background): “In conversation, speakers use the resources of language and the body to form recognizable actions (Levinson, 2013; Schegloff, 1996), which cohere to form sequences of action (Schegloff, 2007).”