Multiattribute and Single‐Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System

By D. Feeny, W. Furlong, George W. Torrance, C. Goldsmith, Z. Zhu, S. Depauw, M. Denton, Michael H. Boyle. Medical Care, 2002

1,414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. (2004, methodology): “Third,to measure functional health, we use the Health Utility Index (HUI),which combines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of health (i.e., a description and a valuation of health attributes) ( Feeny et al.,2002 ). Developed at McMaster University’s Centre for Health Economics and Policy An”
The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications (2003, methodology): “, profile) system and a generic HRQL utility scoring system [2-4].”
Preference-Based EQ-5D Index Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States (2006, methodology): “In contrast, the HUI relies on a multiplicative functional form.(30) In addition, the US scoring algorithm uses TTO values to estimate preferences based on a MAVF rather than standard gamble (SG)–derived utilities based on a multiattribute utility function (MAUF).”
The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12 (2004, background): “087 out of sample.(26) There might be a concern that the valuation survey has been restricted to the United Kingdom and so it is important to extend the valuation work to other countries, including the United States.”