The Hungry Locust

By Stephen J. Simpson, David Raubenheimer. 2000

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00c405d942ce1f7a7e4d4536ea3f4ce15130570b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. S. Behmer
2. C. Körner
3. Daniel Berner
4. W. Blanckenhorn
5. David Raubenheimer
6. F. Clissold
7. Stephen J. Simpson
8. Hans-Christian Schaefer

In Nutrition and Dietetics

1. David Raubenheimer
2. Stephen J. Simpson
3. S. Behmer
4. F. Clissold

In Sensory Systems

1. F. Clissold
2. S. Behmer
3. David Raubenheimer
4. Stephen J. Simpson

Citations in the corpus

• Grasshoppers cope with low host plant quality by compensatory feeding and food selection : N limitation challenged (2005, background): “…OIKOS 2005 ISSN 0030-1299 OIKOS 111: 525 /533, 2005 OIKOS 111:3 (2005) 525 Over the recent years, an alternative to the strictly one-dimensional view of N limitation has emerged, the nutrient balance (or ‘‘geometric’’) framework (Raubenheimer and Simpson 1999, 2004, Simpson and Raubenheimer 2000).”
• The nature of nutrition: a unifying framework (2011, background): “Application of the GF to a study of nutrient–toxin interactions shows how complex and important these interactions can be (Simpson and Raubenheimer 2001).”
• A Global Review on Locusts (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and Their Interactions With Livestock Grazing Practices (2019, background): “At a small scale, clumped resources promote interactions and consequent gregarization (Bouaïchi, 1996; Collett et al., 1998; Despland and Simpson, 2000; Despland et al., 2000; Babah and Sword, 2004; Cisse et al., 2013, 2015), but this relationship may be the opposite at large, landscape-scales…”
• The Biomechanics of Chewing and Plant Fracture: Mechanisms and Implications (2007, background): “The ‘chemostimulatory power’ of the food is an integration of the chemical nature of the food with the nutritional state of the insect, mediated by haemolymph-borne nutritional feedbacks and learning (Simpson, 1995; Simpson and Raubenheimer, 1996; Simpson and Raubenheimer, 2000; Ayali et al., 2002).”
• Discrimination abilities for nutrients: which difference matters for choosy birds and why? (2003, background): “It is in such situations that nutritional balancing strategies become apparent (Simpson & Raubenheimer 2000).”
• Description of a simple synthetic diet for studying nutritional responses in ants (2008, unknown): “Extensive studies have elucidated the nutritional regulatory strategies and mechanisms employed by a range of non-social insects and other animals (e.g. Raubenheimer and Simpson, 1999; Simpson and Raubenheimer, 2000; Simpson et al. , 2004; Raubenheimer and Jones, 2006, Raubenheimer et al. , 2007).”
• Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients (2004, background): “The most extensive studies indicating such regulation have been undertaken on the grassspecializing African migratory locust, Locusta migratoria ( Simpson & Raubenheimer 2000 ).”
• Metal hyperaccumulation in plants: mechanisms of defence against insect herbivores (2005, background): “Locusts are effective models for studying the ways in which invertebrate herbivores can be influenced by various plant constituents ( Simpson & Raubenheimer 2000; Behmer, Simpson & Raubenheimer 2002; Behmer & Nes 2003).”