The effect of habitat quality on foraging patterns, provisioning rate and nestling growth in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus

By I. Tremblay, Donald W. Thomas, J. Blondel, P. Perret, M. Lambrechts. 2004

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00b6c7f91ee6fce54be373d503faf9be5072b22d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Andrew K. Wilson
2. J. Speakman
3. Paul Bellamy
4. Shelley A. Hinsley
5. N. Harrison
6. P. Ferns
7. Ross A. Hill
8. S. Mitchell

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Speakman
2. N. Harrison
3. P. Ferns

Citations in the corpus

• Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major) (2017, unknown): “…abiotic and biotic constraints in our populations, our study suggests that food abundance could explain the patterns we report because the growth of great tit nestlings has been directly correlated with food supply (NaefDaenzer and Keller, 1999; Mägi et al., 2009, but see Tremblay et al., 2005).”
• Effects of structural and functional habitat gaps on breeding woodland birds: working harder for less (2008, methodology): “The lower body mass in poor habitat in Corsica was thought to be due to infestation of the young by blow-fly larvae (Protocalliphora spp.) because the total amount of prey delivered was the same as in the high quality habitat.”