Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications
By Dimitris G. Manolakis, David Marden, Gary A. Shaw. 2003
997 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00b42a7649ac10328fef1d45223484bf9653d995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Hyperspectral Imaging: A Review on UAV-Based Sensors, Data Processing and Applications for Agriculture and Forestry (2017, methodology): “To that end, Manolakis and Shaw [71] underline the importance of the constant false alarm rate (CFAR) processor for dealing with misclassifications.”
- A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition-Based Mahalanobis Distance Method for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection (2016, background): “alleviating covariance contamination caused by anomalies [8], [9].”
- A Novel Ranking-Based Clustering Approach for Hyperspectral Band Selection (2016, background): “Clearly, the obtained hundreds of images can form a 3-D cube, which can be used for surface material classification and identification according to the continuous spectrum of each pixel [1]–[4].”
- Saliency and Gist Features for Target Detection in Satellite Images (2011, background): “For example, for hyper-spectral satellite images, the features applied usually take advantage of the reflection characteristics of different materials [20]–[22] while for multispectral images, the features are usually extracted from fused spectra [23], [24].”