The Validity of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) as a Measure of Emotional Intelligence

By A. Maul. 2012

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Increasing Emotional Intelligence through Training: Current Status and Future Directions (2013, background): “The Nature of Emotional Intelligence The competencies of perception, understanding, util izing and managing emotions effectively in the self and others comprise the core of emotional inte lligence (Maul, 2012; Mayer, Salovey & Caruso, 2004 ; 2008).”
The Validity of the MSCEIT: Additional Analyses and Evidence (2012, background): “Regarding managing emotion, Maul would like us to clarify what we meant by " personal understanding and growth " (Maul, 2012, p. 398).”
Rethinking Traditional Methods of Survey Validation (2017, background): “Arguably, this is exactly what happened in the literature on emotional intelligence; a considerable amount of energy was spent attempting to differentiate typical-behavior and maximum-performance models of EI (e.g., Maul, 2012).”
Emotional Intelligence as an Ability: Theory, Challenges, and New Directions (2018, background): “Furthermore, the MSCEIT has several well-documented psychometric limitations (Fiori et al., 2014; Fiori & Antonakis, 2011; Maul, 2012; Rossen et al., 2008), which have prompted researchers to develop alternative instruments, to generalize findings across assessments, and to create non-commercial…”