Image Resolution in Optical Nanoscopy

By R. Nieuwenhuizen, K. Lidke, M. Bates, D. L. Puig, D. Grünwald, S. Stallinga, B. Rieger. Nature Methods, 2013

712 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Resolution in optical nanoscopy (or super-resolution microscopy) depends on the localization uncertainty and density of single fluorescent labels and on the sample's spatial structure. Currently there is no integral, practical resolution measure that accounts for all factors. We introduce a measure based on Fourier ring correlation (FRC) that can be computed directly from an image. We demonstrate its validity and benefits on two-dimensional (2D) and 3D localization microscopy images of tubulin and actin filaments. Our FRC resolution method makes it possible to compare achieved resolutions in images taken with different nanoscopy methods, to optimize and rank different emitter localization and labeling strategies, to define a stopping criterion for data acquisition, to describe image anisotropy and heterogeneity, and even to estimate the average number of localizations per emitter. Our findings challenge the current focus on obtaining the best localization precision, showing instead how the best image resolution can be achieved as fast as possible.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics, Structural Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/009c371b88a98888a981a24128058f910a55e133

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Alex Small
  2. Shane Stahlheber

In Biophysics

  1. Alex Small
  2. Shane Stahlheber

In Structural Biology

  1. Alex Small
  2. Shane Stahlheber

Citations in the corpus