The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception.
By F. Attneave, M. D. Arnoult. 1956
Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentation (2019, background): “Boundary complexity is perimeter divided by square root area [1].”
- Design and perceptual validation of performance measures for salient object segmentation (2010, methodology): “The PETS dataset [25], Goldmann’s dataset [12], and the ground truth dataset of lake boundaries used in [5] are limited to their respective domains of application.”
- A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Metrics with a Companion Open-Source Toolkit (2021, background): “Back in the mid-50s and 60s the first attempts to recognize simple patterns in images were published [25,26].”
- Increased Alpha-Band Power during the Retention of Shapes and Shape-Location Associations in Visual Short-Term Memory (2011, background): “…15″ LCD screen at a viewing distance of approximately 70 cm. Memory targets and probe stimuli consisted of either black dots or black abstract shapes (Attneave and Arnoult, 1956) chosen from a set of 12 difficult-to-name shapes (Vanderplas and Garvin, 1959), depending on the task condition.”
- A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception I. Perceptual Grouping and Figure-Ground Organization (2012, background): “…slipstream of Shannon's information theory, a few researchers tried to provide a quantitative underpinning to the central Gestalt notion of simplicity (e.g., Attneave, 1954; Attneave & Arnoult, 1956; Hochberg & McAlister, 1953; Leeuwenberg, 1969, 1971; for a review, see Hatfield & Epstein, 1985).”