Decarbonizing China’s energy system – Modeling the transformation of the electricity, transportation, heat, and industrial sectors

By Thorsten Burandt, Bobby Xiong, Konstantin Löffler, P. oei. Applied Energy, 2019

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Growing prosperity among its population and an inherent increasing demand for energy complicate China’s target of combating climate change, while maintaining its economic growth. This paper, therefore, describes three potential decarbonization pathways to analyze different effects for the electricity, transport, heating, and industrial sectors until 2050. Using an enhanced version of the multi-sectoral, open-source Global Energy System Model, enables us to assess the impact of different CO2 budgets on the upcoming energy system transformation. A detailed provincial resolution allows for the implementation of regional characteristics and disparities within China. Conclusively, we complement the model-based analysis with a quantitative assessment of current barriers for the needed transformation. Results indicate that overall energy system CO2 emissions and in particular coal usage have to be reduced drastically to meet (inter-) national climate targets. Specifically, coal consumption has to decrease by around 60% in 2050 compared to 2015. The current Nationally Determined Contributions proposed by the Chinese government of peaking emissions in 2030 are, therefore, not sufficient to comply with a global CO2 budget in line with the Paris Agreement. Renewable energies, in particular photovoltaics and onshore wind, profit from decreasing costs and can provide a more sustainable and cheaper energy source. Furthermore, increased stakeholder interactions and incentives are needed to mitigate the resistance of local actors against a low-carbon transformation.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0084a08b7a5c3381076e73c7bae736b558de423f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Christian Breyer
  2. Brian Vad Mathiesen
  3. D. Bogdanov
  4. Henrik Lund
  5. R. Haas
  6. A. Aghahosseini
  7. Amela Ajanovic
  8. Marta Victoria

In Environmental Engineering

  1. D. Bogdanov
  2. Christian Breyer
  3. Ayobami Solomon Oyewo
  4. A. Aghahosseini
  5. M. Ram
  6. Marta Victoria
  7. Henrik Lund
  8. Mark Z. Jacobson

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. Brian Vad Mathiesen
  2. Henrik Lund
  3. Vasilis Fthenakis
  4. Marco Raugei
  5. Benjamin Sovacool

Citations in the corpus