Using measurement-induced disturbance to characterize correlations as classical or quantum
By Shunlong Luo. 2008
596 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/007c94fe82282833fcb82112c2faf9b8666e4cf0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Bassano Vacchini
- H. Breuer
- Elsi-Mari Laine
- Jyrki Piilo
- Juan Manuel Rodríguez Parrondo
- Gonzalo Manzano
- Kavan Modi
- Tomasz Paterek
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Bassano Vacchini
- Jyrki Piilo
- Elsi-Mari Laine
- H. Breuer
- Juan Manuel Rodríguez Parrondo
- Gonzalo Manzano
- Kavan Modi
- Tomasz Paterek
Citations in the corpus
- The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures (2011, methodology): “(Devi and Rajagopal, 2008; Devi et al., 2011; Li and Luo, 2008) describe a unifying feature of certain classical and separable states.”
- Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems (2015, methodology): “Thus, one can use the quantity C(ρ1SE(0)) = D(ρ1SE(0), ρ2SE(0)) as a measure for the quantum correlations in the initial state ρ1SE(0) (Luo, 2008).”
- Quantum coherence and geometric quantum discord (2017, background): “Based on quantum steering, Hu and Fan (2016b) introduced the steering-induced coherence, and explored its connection with a quantum correlation measure known as measurement-induced disturbance (Luo, 2008).”
- Quantum Fluctuation Theorems for Arbitrary Environments: Adiabatic and Nonadiabatic Entropy Production (2017, background): “This is the so-called mutual induced disturbance introduced by Luo [63].”