Back to the Future: Cleckley as a Guide to the Next Generation of Psychopathy Research.

By Christopher J. Patrick. 2006

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/007b2a58e831e14513126a4572270175a4c8ca29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Multidimensional Nature of Psychopathy: Five Recommendations for Research (2018, background): “Notably, a number of studies in the child and adolescent (e.g. Frick et al. 1999) and adult (e.g., Hicks and Patrick 2006) psychopathy literatures reveal the operation of cooperative suppressor effects, whereby controlling statistically for Factor I features increases the statistical association…”
Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness (2009, methodology): “To provide a basis for diagnostic clarity and specificity, Cleckley set forth a list of 16 specific criteria for the disorder, which can be grouped into three categories (Patrick, 2006): (a) positive adjustment indicators (good intelligence and social adeptness, absence of delusions or irrationality”
The search for the successful psychopath (2010, background): “These scales largely define the PPI psychopathy factor ‘‘Fearless Dominance”, which has been associated with educational attainment, sociability, and executive functioning (Patrick, 2006).”
Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. (2010, methodology): ““Cleckley did not include criminality as a defining feature” of psychopathy (Forth, Brown, Hart, & Hare, 1996, p. 531; see also Patrick, 2006).”
Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. (2008, unknown): “P sy ch by U ni ve rs ity o f B”
Introduction and validation of Psychopathic Personality Traits Scale (PPTS) in a large prison sample (2016, background): “5 indicators of behavioural expressions of the disorder, such as deviancy and maladjustment (Edens, Skeem, Cruise, & Cauffman, 2001; Patrick, 2007; Patrick, Hicks, Nichol, & Krueger, 2007; Rogers, 1995), which can have a profound influence on the scales’ predictive utility for criminal behaviour.”