Gorenstein liaison, complete intersection liaison invariants and unobstructedness

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Monomial ideals, almost complete intersections and the Weak Lefschetz property (2008, background): “This follows from the exact sequence (see [8], Lemma 4.”
Gorenstein liaison and ACM sheaves (2003, unknown): “1), answering a natural question about Gorenstein liaison [13], Remark 2.”
On the shape of a pure O-sequence (2010, background): “The name stems from the fact that I ′ can be Gorenstein linked to I in two steps if I is unmixed and R/J is Cohen-Macaulay and generically Gorenstein ([43], Proposition 5.”
Reduced arithmetically Gorenstein schemes and simplicial polytopes with maximal Betti numbers (2001, background): “0 # # # 0 0 0 SinceI and J :g arelinked by K 0= K :g,theideal(I+ J):g = I+ (J :g)isGorenstein ofcodim ension cand hastheh-vector(1;c;h2;:::;ht;:::;ht;ht 1;:::;c;1)with the nal 1occurringin degrees 1.”
Containment counterexamples for ideals of various configurations of points in PN (2013, methodology): “ing at the excluded point, for comparison with the results in Lemmas 4.5 and 4.6. In order to do this, we use a tool from linkage theory, namely basic double linkage, details on which can be found in [KMMNP]. The idea of basic double linkage is to construct an ideal as I = FB + J, where J ⊆ B are ho”