The Isomap Algorithm and Topological Stability
By M. Balasubramanian, Eric L. Schwartz. 2002
818 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Ameet Talwalkar
- Kevin Swersky
- Richard S. Zemel
- Jaap van den Herik
- Shuicheng Yan
- Hongyun Cai
- Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang
- Thomas L. Ainsworth
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Yi Yang
- Xiaogang Wang
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jitendra Malik
- Shuicheng Yan
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques, and Applications (2017, methodology): “For example, Isomap [78] incorporates the geodesic distance in A.”
- Riemannian Manifold Learning (2008, methodology): “An appropriately chosen neighborhood size is the key to the success of these algorithms [36].”
- Graph Learning: A Survey (2021, background): “and the subsequent studies [67], [71]–[73] tackle this issue.”
- Stochastic k-Neighborhood Selection for Supervised and Unsupervised Learning (2013, methodology): “While this approach to dimensionality reduction is taken by popular methods such as Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) (Roweis & Saul, 2000) and Isomap (Balasubramanian et al., 2002), the SNE method differs from these methods because it uses a fundamentally smooth objective that is based on matching dis”
- Non-linear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Isomaps (2004, methodology): “There is a serious problem in the Isomap algorithm which is referred to as Short Circuiting [7].”
- A Review of Feature Selection and Feature Extraction Methods Applied on Microarray Data (2015, methodology): “Many variants of Isomap have been used; for example, Balasubramanian and Schwartz proposed a tree connected version which differs in the way the neighbourhood graph is constructed [72].”
- A General Exponential Framework for Dimensionality Reduction (2014, background): “The algorithmic performance is often sensitive to the parameter k and the performance may vary each time k changes [24], [25].”
- Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery (2005, methodology): “to be more vulnerable to noise (see response of Tenenbaum, de Silva, and Langford in [8]).”
- Feature dimensionality reduction: a review (2022, background): “ISOMAP believes that when the data set has an embedded manifold structure [92, 93], the corresponding description of the observation space data set in the low-dimensional structure can be obtained according to the distance map.”
- Large-scale manifold learning (2008, background): “Since Isomap needs to compute shortest paths in the neighborhood graph, the presence of bad edges can cause leakage or ‘short-circuits’[2].”
- Interpolation-based reduced-order modelling for steady transonic flows via manifold learning (2014, background): “The optimal choice of these parameters is problem dependent and the success of Isomap depends largely on the selected values (Balasubramanian et al. 2002).”
- Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review (2008, background): “An important weakness of the Isomap algorithm is its topological instability [7].”
- View-invariant human action recognition via robust locally adaptive multi-view learning (2015, methodology): “These methods can also be divided into two groups: linear methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA) (Wold et al., 1987), latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) (Balakrishnama and Ganapathiraju, 1998), and non-negative matrix factorization (Lee and Seung, 1999), and nonlinear methods, such as te”
- Charting a Manifold (2002, background): “It has been noted that trusted-set methods are vulnerable to noise because they consider the subset of point-to-point relationships that has the lowest signal-to-noise ratio; small changes to the trusted set can induce large changes in the set of constraints on the embedding, making solutions unstab”
- Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE) (2021, background): “, A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science, 290, 5500, 2319-2323 (2000) [45] Balasubramanian, M.”