Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-prey Foods

By J. Lundgren. 2009

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/003e9d865006eed8e0b50e6617f6576bcbe77492

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. K. Miller
2. D. Weber
3. J. Harwood
4. G. Heimpel
5. J. Lundgren
6. J. Obrycki
7. P. De Clercq
8. Michael Whiting

In Genetics

1. K. Miller
2. J. Obrycki
3. D. Weber
4. P. De Clercq
5. J. Harwood
6. Michael Whiting
7. R. O’neil
8. T. Kring

In Insect Science

1. J. Harwood
2. Jörg Romeis
3. J. Obrycki
4. T. Kring
5. R. O’neil
6. M. Meissle
7. S. Naranjo
8. J. Lundgren

Citations in the corpus

• Non-crop vegetation associated with chili pepper agroecosystems promote the abundance and survival of aphid predators (2013, neutral): “It is widely accepted that non-prey food items are associated with increased survival and reproduction in coccinellids (Lundgren, 2009a, 2009b), and floral and extrafloral nectaries on weeds supply pollen and nectar to adult coccinellids (e.g., Pember-ton and Vandenberg, 1993; Leather et al., 1999;…”
• Aphidophagy by Coccinellidae: Application of biological control in agroecosystems (2009, methodology): “…aphid populations may also rely on species targeted by the Bt crop (e.g., lepidopteran eggs or larvae; Evans, 2009), or prey that contain large amounts of Bt toxin (e.g., mites Dutton et al., 2002; Biddinger et al., 2009), or altered crop-based non-prey foods including pollen (Lundgren, 2009).”
• Assessing the trophic ecology of the Coccinellidae: Their roles as predators and as prey (2009, background): “Alternative foods such as lepidopteran and coleopteran immatures (Evans, in this issue) and non-prey foods (Lundgren, in this issue) are critical components of optimal diets in most coccinellids, and shape the natural histories of these and other predators (Lundgren, 2009).”
• Lady beetles as predators of insects other than Hemiptera (2009, neutral): “Other studies have explored the use of food sprays (e.g., Hagen et al., 1971; Evans and Richards, 1997; Wade et al., 2008; Lundgren, 2009) to manipulate dispersal and aggregation of lady beetles to promote biological control of insect pests other than Hemiptera in agricultural and silvicultural sett”
• Enhancing pest control in annual crops by conservation of predatory Heteroptera (2011, background): “crop plants provide requisites and several benefits to the natural enemies such as alternative food and refuges (Jervis and Kidd, 1996; Landis et al., 2000; Begum et al., 2006; Lundgren, 2009).”
• Current status and potential of conservation biological control for agriculture in the developing world (2013, background): “The effect of extra-floral nectar, an omnipresent food in several cropping systems (Lundgren, 2009; Nicolson et al., 2010), has only recently been assessed for phytoseiids, lacewings, and whitefly parasitoids in Benin, Brazil, and Colombia, respectively.”
• Coccinellidae as predators of mites: Stethorini in biological control (2009, background): “McMurtry et al. (1970) reviewed the biology and ecology of several North American Stethorus spp.”
• Choosing natural enemies for conservation biological control: use of the prey detectability half‐life to rank key predators of Colorado potato beetle (2010, background): “…of prey eaten, the time since consuming a prey item, the temperature regime from the time of consumption until the animal was collected, and whether alternate prey were consumed during the feeding interval (Sopp & Wratten, 1986; Sopp et al., 1992; Hagler & Naranjo, 1997; Weber & Lundgren, 2009).”
• Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “Nectar is an important source of carbohydrates for adult parasitoids and some predators (Coll and Guershon, 2002; Lundgren, 2009), although there is no evidence that nectar contains Cry proteins.”
• Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control (2009, neutral): “Intraspecific variability is inherent in the nutritional quality of non-prey foods, including pollen (Karise et al., 2006; Lundgren and Wiedenmann, 2004; Lundgren, 2009) and nectar (Shuel, 1955; Cruden et al.”
• Pollen as an alternative or supplementary food for the mirid predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. (2010, background): “In contrast to several members of the Anthocoridae (Lundgren, 2009), predatory mirids are not generally thought of as facultative pollen feeders.”
• Benefits and risks of exotic biological control agents (2011, neutral): “Numerous parasitoids and predators use nectar, pollen, or plant juices as sources of (supplementary) food or moisture without adverse effects for the host plant (Alomar and Wiedenmann 1996; Lundgren 2009).”
• Shifting paradigms in the history of classical biological control (2018, background): “Lying-in-wait agents, on the other hand, illustrate how efficacy can trade off with safety since it is precisely the broad diet breadth (including omnivory) that increases the efficacy of these agents (Coll and Guershon 2002; Symondson et al. 2002; Lundgren 2009).”
• The evolution of food preferences in Coccinellidae (2009, background): “9) (Hagen, 1962; Lundgren, 2009b).”
• The Role of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Weed Seed Consumption: A Review (2015, background): “Postdispersal seed consumption can cause direct death of weedy plants (Crawley 2000; Harper 1977), and serves as a critical factor determining the population dynamics of weeds in agroecosystems (Crawley 2000; Lundgren 2009).”