Mapping Neutral Hydrogen during Reionization with the Lyα Emission from Quasar Ionization Fronts

By S. Cantalupo, C. Porciani, S. Lilly. 2007

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a new method to directly map the neutral-hydrogen distribution during the reionization epoch and constrain the emission properties of the highest redshift quasars (QSOs). As a tracer of H I, we propose to use the Lyα radiation produced by quasar ionization fronts (I-fronts) that expand in the partially ionized intergalactic medium (IGM) before reionization is complete. These Lyα photons are mainly generated by H I collisional excitations. Combining two radiative transfer models (one for the QSO ionizing radiation and one for the Lyα photons), we estimate the expected Lyα spectral shape and surface brightness (SBLyα) for a large number of configurations where we varied both the properties of the ionizing QSO and of the surrounding medium. We find that the expected signal is observable as a single (broad) emission line with a characteristic width of 100-200 km s−1. The expected SBLyα produced at redshift z ≳ 6.5 within a fully neutral region (at mean density) by a typical QSO I-front lies in the range 10−21 to 10−20 ergs s−1 cm−2 arcsec−2 and decreases proportionally to (1 + z)2 for a given QSO age. QSOs with harder spectra may produce a significantly brighter emission at early phases. The signal may cover up to a few hundred square arcminutes on the sky and should be already detectable with current facilities by means of moderate- to high-resolution spectroscopy. The detection of this Lyα emission can shed new light on the reionization history, the age and the emission properties of the highest redshift QSOs.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00323ab9a0e39fb2a5c9433affb87813f80369e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Pfrommer
  2. Volker Springel
  3. Torsten A. Ensslin
  4. A. Strong
  5. E. Orlando
  6. R. Maiolino
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. Anna Franckowiak

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. C. Pfrommer
  2. Torsten A. Ensslin
  3. Volker Springel
  4. A. Strong
  5. E. Orlando
  6. Anna Franckowiak
  7. I. Grenier
  8. Igor V. Moskalenko

Citations in the corpus