On the application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology.
By N. H. Barton, J. Coe. 2009
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- David M. McCandlish
- Faruck Morcos
- Herbert Levine
- Ryan R. Cheng
- Riccardo Zecchina
- Karl J. Friston
- José N. Onuchic
- Joshua B. Plotkin
In Molecular Biology
- Faruck Morcos
- Ryan R. Cheng
- José N. Onuchic
- Herbert Levine
- Samuel Coulbourn Flores
- Ryan L. Hayes
- Olle Nordesjö
- Riccardo Zecchina
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Fitness Landscape of HIV-1 Gag: Advanced Modeling Approaches and Validation of Model Predictions by In Vitro Testing (2014, background): “We expect more prevalent sequences to be more fit, consistent with expectations from simple models of evolution [23] though the precise correspondence between fitness and prevalence may have a more complicated dependence on factors such as the shape of the fitness landscape, as predicted by quasispe”
- Translating HIV sequences into quantitative fitness landscapes predicts viral vulnerabilities for rational immunogen design (2013, unknown): “Under relatively restrictive assumptions, Sella and Hirsh have precisely derived the connection between E and fitness (Sella and Hirsh, 2005).”
- The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution (2011, background): “It is actually possible to draw a detailed correspondence between the key variables in the two areas (Barton and Coe, 2009; Sella and Hirsh, 2005).”
- Spin models inferred from patient-derived viral sequence data faithfully describe HIV fitness landscapes (2013, unknown): “But these models cannot identify which specific sites in these collectively co-evolving groups should be targeted to maximally compromise viral fitness, and how mutational escape pathways that exist even within these regions may be blocked by additional immune responses.”
- The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? (2010, background): “This means that free energy is the complement of value, and its long-term average is the complement of adaptive fitness (also known as free fitness in evolutionary biolog”
- Connecting the Sequence-Space of Bacterial Signaling Proteins to Phenotypes Using Coevolutionary Landscapes (2016, methodology): “The Boltzmann form of P was previously derived for an evolving population in the limit where the product of the population size and mutation rate is very small (Sella and Hirsh 2005).”
- Life as we know it (2013, unknown): “Indeed, free energy functionals have been invoked to describe natural selection [61].”
- Inverse statistical problems: from the inverse Ising problem to data science (2017, background): “Examples are found in sequence analysis, where population dynamics leads to an equilibrium steady state [24, 200] and the energy can often be approximated by pairwise couplings [153, 195].”
- Free-Energy Minimization and the Dark-Room Problem (2012, background): “This means that the surprise can be reduced by changing sensory input (action), predictions of that input (perception), or the model per se; through evolution to minimize free energy or maximize free-fitness (Sella and Hirsh, 2005).”
- Epistasis and the Dynamics of Reversion in Molecular Evolution (2016, background): “Population-genetic model We consider a population evolving in continuous time under weak mutation on an arbitrary finite-state fitness landscape (e.g. Iwasa 1988; Sella and Hirsh 2005; McCandlish et al. 2015b).”