Contact rates between possums revealed by proximity data loggers

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

New Radiocollars for the Detection of Proximity among Individuals (2006, methodology): “To our knowledge, the only previous attempt at proximity detection has been the MateID system (Sirtrack Ltd.; Ji et al. 1999, 2005).”
Monitoring Animal Behaviour and Environmental Interactions Using Wireless Sensor Networks, GPS Collars and Satellite Remote Sensing (2009, background): “Proximity loggers are smaller than GPS devices and have lower power requirements enabling them to be deployed for longer periods of time [43].”
Management of disease in wild mammals (2009, background): “The recent development of proximity collars or dataloggers that record when tagged individuals are within a certain range presents new opportunities to investigate how wild mammals associate and contact one another (Ji et al. 2005).”
Effects of Joint Space Use and Group Membership on Contact Rates Among White-Tailed Deer (2007, background): “Past researchers have 61 quantified contact rates by observing contacts visually (Totton et al. 2002) or using 62 telemetry to infer how often animals come in close proximity (White and Harris 1994, 63 Caley et al. 1998, Ramsey et al. 2002, White et al. 2003, Ji et al. 2005).”