Training Deformable Part Models with Decorrelated Features
By Ross B. Girshick, Jitendra Malik. 2013
40 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Bernt Schiele
- Trevor Darrell
- Ross B. Girshick
- Alan L. Yuille
- Kaiming He
- Jitendra Malik
- Xiaogang Wang
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Bernt Schiele
- Jitendra Malik
- Xiaogang Wang
- Alan L. Yuille
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
Citations in the corpus
- What Makes for Effective Detection Proposals? (2015, methodology): “-0.3 -7.4 0.1 -4.1 -10.2 -0.5 -7.2 3.0 -4.8 -1.7 2.5 2.0 -1.9 -2.5 -4.6 -1.5 -0.8 0.7 -0.3 -0.8 -2.0 Table 2: LM-LLDA detection results on PASCAL 2007 (with bounding box regression).”
- How good are detection proposals, really? (2014, methodology): “This section analyses the detection proposals in the context of a DPM object detector, namely the LM-LLDA variant [14].”
- Deformable Part Models with CNN Features (2014, methodology): “To achieve efficiency during training we exploit the LDA-based acceleration to DPM training of [5], using a whitened feature space constructed for CNN features; this reduces the computation time typically by a factor of four.”
- Using k-Poselets for Detecting People and Localizing Their Keypoints (2014, methodology): “It’s also notable that we trained each k-poselet detector using a small set of only 200 negative images in order to accelerate training, as suggested in [16].”